US CAMPAIGN FOR BURMA
For Immediate Release: Monday, April 25th, 2005
Contact: Jeremy Woodrum, (202) 223-0300
Human Rights Group Calls on ChevronTexaco To End Investment With
Burma's Dictator
Project will "completely undermine all progress on improving its
reputation and expose it to a wave of lawsuits, bad publicity, and shareholder
anger" One week before ChevronTexaco's annual shareholder meeting
in Los Angeles, the US Campaign for Burma has announced it plans to launch
a campaign to demand the company drop its soon to be acquired investment
with the ruling military dictatorship in the Southeast Asian country of
Burma.
ChevronTexaco announced on April 4th that it had reached an $18.4 billion
deal to buy Unocal Corporation, thus acquiring stake in the construction
of the Yadana gas pipeline in Burma. ChevronTexaco has so far flip-flopped
on its intention of shedding the stake, leaving the company among the
very last US companies still doing business with Burma's cruel dictator,
Than Shwe. The project is co-owned by Burma's Ministry of Oil and Gas.
According to those living in the region, the construction of the Yadana
gas pipeline has brought immeasurable suffering on the people of Burma
and substantially strengthened the ruling General Than Shwe. Human rights
organizations including Earthrights International have documented a
situation tantamount to slavery for those villagers unfortunate enough
to live in the area where the pipeline was constructed. Soldiers of the
ruling dictator also displaced hundreds of villages along the pipeline
route. Villagers faced gruesome torture, rape and extra-judicial killings.
In addition to effects on the local population, money earned from Unocal's
investment in the Yadana pipeline has aided the military regime's purchase
of weapons and has helped it to fund an increase in the the size of its
army to nearly 500,000 soldiers. Since Burma has no external enemies,
the expansion has been carried out to assist in crushing the country's
democracy movement. Unocal's investment in Burma has also helped to line
the pockets of Than Shwe and his cronies. Their lavish lifestyles stand
in stark contrast to the dire poverty the country's citizens find themselves
in. Than Shwe's regime spends so little on healthcare that one in ten
Burmese children die before they reach age five. "ChevronTexaco is
purchasing a nightmare for its management and shareholders," said
Aung Din, co-founder of US Campaign for Burma. "If they keep the
pipeline, it will hang on the company's neck like a lead weight and completely
undermine all progress they have made in improving their reputation."
Aung San Suu Kyi--the world's only imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize recipient
and leader of Burma's democracy movement--has repeatedly called on Western
companies to not invest with Than Shwe's regime.
The efforts are modeled on the 1980s anti-apartheid movement, which brought
heavy financial losses to companies which insisted in operating in South
Africa before Nelson Mandela was released from prison. The international
movement for democracy in Burma has pressured approximately ninety companies
to cut ties with the country. Among these companies are Pepsi, Amoco,
and Premier Oil. Massive international boycotts, shareholder anger, and
press reports of human rights violations led to steep financial losses
for those companies who tried to continue doing business in Burma, damaging
the reputation of the companies to such an extent that withdrawal proved
their only option.
Unocal had the notorious distinction of being the largest US company to
maintain a substantial investment in Burma and has faced a protracted,
seven year lawsuit over claims that villagers suffered serious human rights
abuses during the construction of the pipeline. The case made Unocal a
vilified company and brought major objections from its shareholders. After
spending tens of millions in its defense of dollars over seven years,
Unocal ultimately settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
In contrast to Unocal, Texaco decided in 1997 to end its after operation
in what was widely interpreted as a move to end nationwide protests against
the company and in response to the implementation of US economic sanctions
on Burma's military regime. The move allowed Texaco to avoid a raft of
boycotts, lawsuits, and investor anger faced by Unocal. Should ChevronTexaco
not take the initiative in divesting from Burma, the US Campaign for Burma
has pleged to organize nationwide pressure on ChevronTexaco businesses.
"Surely, ChevronTexaco shareholders will be disappointed to lose
money over a project that's not even essential to the company," added
Aung Din. Additionally, ChevronTexaco has opened itself up to possibility
of more lawsuits from villagers harmed during the construction of the
pipeline. Observers understand the settlement between villagers and Unocal
to be "very substantial", which is likely to lead to more villagers
filing cases against the company's new owners, ChevronTexaco. |
|
|